The video review is pretty brutal. Regarding side-by-side app mode, Patel says:
In many ways this is a dream that has turned into a terrible, unresponsive nightmare.
But hey, at least it’s a feature the iPad doesn’t have (unless you use actual pen and paper).
I had the privilege of being the guest on episode 3 of the internet’s greatest new podcast: CMD+SPACE. It was a huge honor to be on the show because the guests for the previous 2 episodes were big heroes of mine: Merlin Mann and Jason Snell.
Myke interviewed me regarding the membership to shawnblanc.net and we talked a lot about what can make or break a reader-supported endeavor.
Since I’m caffeinated, I’ll get right to it: The Espro Press makes an amazing cup of french press coffee.
These things are finally starting to show up for sale, so it’s time to review the one I got from Kickstarter back in April.
The original Espro Press is an 8-ounce single-serving press pot. I’d never even heard of it before I saw their project on Kickstarter, where their aim was to build a 32-ounce version. Since I am genetically predisposed to back any coffee-related project on Kickstarter, I pitched in my $85 and “pre-ordered” one of the large Espro Presses.
Their project was funded (more than five times over), and in early April of this year I received my 32-ounce (1,000 ml) press.
Seven days a week I brew a cup of coffee. Most days it’s with my AeroPress, but once or twice a week I like to make french press. People often ask me what makes a better cup of coffee — AeroPress or french press? Well, they both make fantastic coffee with their advantages and disadvantages. I enjoy both for different reasons; they’re both favorites, really.
So what is it about the Espro Press that makes it so much nicer than my Bodum french press? Two things:
The pot is durable and rugged. And it’s heavy. Since it’s stainless steel, the best way to keep it clean is to hand wash it. But I’ve been putting it in the dishwasher since I got it and there are no rust spots.
The double-walled steel construction helps keep the coffee hotter for longer. Normally after brewing a pot of french press I would pour it into a vacuum thermos. Now I just bring the press downstairs to my office with me. Though the Espro Press doesn’t keep the coffee piping for 3-4 hours like my vacuum thermos does, it does keep it hot enough for over an hour (about how long it takes me to finish a pot) and it means one less vessel to clean.
| Time (min.) | Temp (F) |
| 41 | 168° |
| 10 | 166° |
| 15 | 162° |
| 30 | 156° |
| 45 | 149° |
| 60 | 144° |
Since the press rod and lid are metal, they conduct a good amount of heat. Which means some heat is lost through the rod and lid, as well as the fact that the lid gets very hot to the touch. But it also means they are built to last — a tradeoff I’m willing to accept.
Double-walled stainless steel french presses are not a new thing. For example: the $100 Frieling french press has a high-quality double-walled stainless steel carafe, not unlike the Espro Press. But the Frieling has the same basic steel mesh filter that you’ll find in a common Bodum french press.
What makes the Espro Press the Espro Press is the filter.
It’s a double-layered micro filter basket with a rubber lip seal. It’s unlike any other press pot filter I’ve seen, and it makes a great cup of coffee.
The filter basket is designed to keep as much of the grit out of the brewed coffee as possible. Here’s a comparison of the grit left at the bottom of a cup of coffee by an AeroPress, an Espro Press, and a classic french press:
Obviously the AeroPress wins the “keep as much grit out as possible” competition because I used a paper filter.2 The Espro Press, however, has far less grit than the classic french press. And since the Espro uses a micro filter, you don’t lose any oils to a paper filter. (Though I don’t know that I’d even be able to tell the difference.)
I drank all three of the now empty cups of coffee you see above. Comparing the Espro Press to the French Press side by side like that I realized just how superior the Espro Press is. The classic french press coffee was noticeably more acidic and bitter (not horribly so) than the Espro Press coffee.
I’ve always loved the rich and bold coffee that a french press makes, and the Espro seems to make the best version of it.
The Espro Press, despite having a much more complex filter than your average french press, is still just as easy to clean.
Removing the filter basket from the pot, I simply rinse off the grounds from the sides of the basket, rinse out the pot itself, and then put the whole thing into the dishwasher.
The basket can be easily separated so as to clean out the middle zone of the double walls. Until today, I had yet to do this. Here’s a is a shot of the grit that accumulated inside the middle filter wall after 30 or so uses of the Espro Press (and, for the record, I intentionally didn’t clean the inside wall of the basket, because I wanted to see how dirty it would get over an extended period of time):
There’s no reason to let even that much grit accumulate. Taking apart the filter basket is quite simple (it easily twists apart), allowing you to easily separate the outer and inner baskets every time you put it in the dishwasher.
The Espro Press carafe can hold 1,500 ml of water. But that leaves no room for any coffee grounds or the filter basket. You can brew up to 1,000 ml of coffee, but I’ve found that the best recipe is when you brew 750 ml.3
The reason I shy away from brewing the full 1,000 ml capacity is that large filter basket gets in the way when you are brewing that much liquid. About 230 ml of liquid are displaced into the basket and thus don’t fully brew with the rest of the water.
Therefore, when brewing 1,000 ml of coffee I do 70 grams of grinds instead of the recommended 60. This causes the water below the basket to brew stronger, and then be diluted a bit once the basket is pressed down and the previously displaced water rejoins the brewed coffee.
The recipe I prefer is the one that Espro recommends for a 3/4 pot:
Now, if you’re looking for an iPhone coffee app, I can recommend one of those as well.
Andre Torrez:
Rather than say: “I am too busy, I don’t have any time for X.” I realize I can be honest and say I am not interested enough in X to do it.
Being honest and saying we’re not interested: honesty to the other person or honesty to ourselves? Probably both.
Today was the 10th anniversary of John Gruber’s first post on Daring Fireball. Chances are good if you’re reading this site then you also read Daring Fireball. In fact, it’s likely that you found this site in the first place thanks to a link on DF.
I’ve been reading Daring Fireball since 2005 (shortly after I got my first Mac). I remember first reading the DF home page and how hilarious it was. Here was this guy posting links to various articles and websites and then saying something sarcastic about them.
There were no comments on the site and so I had no idea that this weblog I’d stumbled across was already so widely popular (for being so different from a site like Macworld I thought it was an obscure one-off website, and was clueless that it had tens of thousands of daily readers), nor did I know the impact John’s writing would eventually have on my own writing and even on my career.
Design-wise, Daring Fireball has hardly changed in the past decade. Moreover, the subtle humor and sometimes-not-so-subtle sarcasm of John’s writing is still as present now as it was a decade ago. The personality, voice, and tone — all still there, all still instantly recognizable as Gruber.
And but so, as Apple and their products have matured and gone mainstream so too has John’s writing. Gone are the days of Jerry Seinfeld quotes sneaking their way under the DF logo.
In a nut: John’s writing has grown up. Whereby “grown up” I mean “if you compare the writing of today to the writing of 2002, you’ll see that John takes himself a bit more seriously and that his writing is less a bit less playful”.
Speaking of John’s writing:
My all-time favorite DF article is still Full Metal Jacket.
I interviewed John more than 4 years ago to talk about writing, DF, how the Linked List began, how he got into Macs, what John eats for breakfast, and more.
In that interview, John stated that two of his favorite weblog writers are were Paul Graham and Dean Allen. Of them he said:
They’re the two who’ve written the most things that simultaneously delighted me (as a reader) and filled my heart with jealousy (as a writer).
Likewise, John Gruber is a writer who has simultaneously delighted me (as a reader) and made me jealous (as a writer).
Do you buy stuff on the Internet? I thought so. That’s why you’d probably like Junecloud’s Delivery Status apps.
Delivery Status is both a universal iOS app and a Dashboard Widget for OS X. You paste the tracking number for a shipment you’re expecting, and Delivery Status will keep tabs on it, letting you know where the package is and what day it will arrive. The apps and widget stay in sync via Junecloud’s sync service.
Delivery Status supports 7 languages and over 35 global delivery services. I’ve used it for tracking packages from UPS, USPS, and FedEx and it has always been accurate.
When you get your shipment notification from Amazon or Apple or whomever, there are a few ways to add the tracking number to Delivery Status:
The iOS apps are clever enough to recognize if you’ve got a tracking number on your device’s clipboard. If so, when you launch the app you’re asked if you want the tracking number to be used to create a new delivery.
[email protected] and their servers will attempt to identify the tracking number and then add the shipment to your list of deliveries.I found that when I simply forward the email I get from Amazon, Junecloud isn’t able to find the tracking number. But by first highlighting the tracking number before forwarding, then only that information is sent, and Junecloud was quickly able to add it.
When adding a delivery via email, whatever the subject line is will be the title of your item. Since I don’t want a delivery item called “Your Amazon.com order of “Contigo AUTOSEAL Stainless…” has shipped!”, I change the subject line to a more accurate description.
If you want push notifications in the iOS apps, you can easily set them up. They rely on your Dashboard Widget and your Junecloud sync account, which means that your iOS device will receive a push notification whenever your Mac notices the status of a delivery has changed. It would be nice if there were a more granular control about which statuses to send notifications about — I’d prefer to only receive notifications when an item is out on the truck for delivery and when it has been delivered.
To sum up, for someone who gets a fair amount of stuff delivered, Delivery Status is a superb way to track it. I haven’t seen the UPS or FedEx sites in months.
My thanks to Boom for sponsoring the RSS feed this week.
Boom is a volume booster app for your Mac.
It increases the system audio volume to produce better-quality audio from the built-in speakers. The system-wide graphic equalizer can further enhance your Mac’s audio quality.
Boom won the Macworld Best of Show award for its simplicity, elegancy and well-crafted user interface. It is priced at $6.99 and can be purchased from the Global Delight Online Store or through the Mac App Store. There’s also a free 7-day trial.
If you had any doubts about the validity of those unibody iPhone rumors, let industrial designer Don Lehman put them to rest with this articulate take on why the photos point to the next iPhone being the most robust and well-designed iPhone yet.
…the career and communication landscapes have drastically changed in the past 20 years.
Thanks to the camera phone millions of people are discovering the joy of hobby photography.
Thanks to Twitter we can get real-time news and on-site reporting from people all around the world.
Thanks to social networks and email we can get instant feedback about our projects from an audience that lives all around the world.
Thanks to blogs and ebooks any writer can publish their ideas and stories to a global audience.
Thanks to iTunes any musician can sell their music on the biggest music store in the world.
Thanks to the Web you can work from anywhere in the world and collaborate with anyone else in the world.
Thanks to Amazon and eBay and Shopify anyone can sell their products to anyone looking to buy.
You used to need a canvas and paintbrush, or an expensive camera, or a book deal, or a job at the local paper, or a store front on Main Street, or to get signed by a big label. Now all you need is an Internet connection.
This episode of The B&B Podcast turned out very well. Ben and I talked a bit about open source software, plain text, and the future of the digital landscape and how that affects the apps we use today, but for most of the show we talked about our views of the right and wrong ways to publish a link list-type blog.
Today, Cultured Code has shipped versions 2.0 of their Mac and iOS apps as well as their Cloud Sync. I bet even the team at Cultured Code would agree when I say, finally.
It has been 20 months since they first began talking publicly about over-the-air cloud syncing of the Things application suite and 6 months since they kicked off the public beta of their syncing engine. And Jürgen’s blog post from December 2010 starts by saying that it had already been two years since the Cultured Code team had first begun thinking about bringing cloud sync to the Things suite of apps. Which means that from the first internal talks at Cultured Code’s offices to the public release of their syncing service nearly 4 years have passed.
There is no arguing that over-the-air sync for Things has been a long time coming. Jürgen himself quotes a user who called the speed of their progress “glacial.”
When their Cloud Sync transitioned from private to public beta earlier this year, 35,000 people were already signed up and waiting for it. I too installed the beta apps and ran an AppleScript to port all of my to-do items and projects out of OmniFocus and into Things. I then spent the next few weeks using the beta version of Things and Cloud Sync.
After backing up my OmniFocus database, I ported all my currently-non-completed tasks (about 275 active to-do items) into Things on the Mac. I then launched Things on my iPad and set it up to sync. It downloaded the whole library of tasks and was set up and running in 10 seconds.
I also like how Things triggers its sync events. Basically, any time you do anything, the app syncs. The Cloud Sync is fast, impressive, and feels extremely reliable. I also like how they handle sync conflicts.
In my review of Things over three years ago, I wrote:
Each of us has our own way of dealing with responsibility and our own expression of productivity. Tinkering and then switching is usually not the fault of the software. We’re not looking for the best app, but rather the best app for us.
Things held my to-do list for two years before I switched to OmniFocus, and I have now been using the latter for two years.
I have a lot of respect for both of these apps. Though they are similar in some regards, they are also quite different. In a nut, OmniFocus is extremely powerful and can bend your to-do list five ways from Sunday to show you precisely what you need to do.
In contrast, Things’s task-bending power ends after the ability to assign a due date and a project to your task. But, that “limitation” is by design. Things stands as a premier example of an app which handles well the balance between ease-of-use and depth-of-features.
Among my friends who use Things, I know they love it because of its simplicity, its clean design, and its low learning curve. For many people simpler is better, and an app that is less powerful is more desirable. Even for myself, in most cases, this is how I feel towards apps — I very much prefer simpler apps. But not in the case of OmniFocus.
What I love about the power and flexibility of OmniFocus is that I trust it completely with my to-do items. I trust that a task I put into OmniFocus will come and find me when it is time to be completed. Not to mention OmniFocus on the iPad is one of my favorite apps of all time. I don’t know how I could ever give it up.
What I love about Things is its clean design and now its fast syncing engine. I find Things on iOS to be noticeably quicker at syncing on start. Unfortunately, in my past experience using Things, I often felt that I needed to babysit my entire to-do list for fear of something falling through the cracks. However, with the new daily review feature, this may no longer be the case.
Only the team at Cultured Code knows why it took several years to ship their Cloud Sync and updates to their apps. Did they really need all that time to build their syncing engine? I don’t know; and without all the facts I refuse to criticize them for it. But what I do know is that the end product — what they have shipped today — is extremely fast and reliable. The updates to the apps, the new look of their website, the way Cloud Sync works, all of it is very well polished. Cultured Code should be proud of their finished work.
In an interview on Technology Review, Drew Houston of Dropbox said that excellence is the sum of 1,000 little details. While Cultured Code’s suite of apps has been slow to adapt features in some areas, what they have shipped so far is certainly not lacking on excellence and attention to detail. I hope today’s updates lay a foundation for the future of Things to be a bright one filled with details of excellence.
It’s unfortunate that many people don’t think about backing up their data until it’s too late. I can’t imagine how devastating it would be to lose weeks, months, or years worth of family photos, important documents, project folders, and more.
External hard drives seem to get cheaper by the minute; off-site backup services are more affordable and easy to use than ever; and heck, OS X has been shipping with built-in backup software for years.
With very little effort and cost you can set up an automated and trustworthy backup system. I can only assume most people don’t back up their data because they are either lazy, unsure where to start, don’t see a need, or all of the above.
Assuming Mat Honan’s horror story gives you the motivation for backing up, here are some tips on how to set up a rock-solid backup system.
* * *
A great backup system looks like this:
Keeping a regular backup on an external hard drive is the smartest way to keep your data backed up. It’s also the easiest way to restore something if your computer has a catastrophic failure.
The easiest way to back up your Mac is to plug in an external drive and turn on Time Machine. If you don’t have an external hard drive, here’s a big and fast one.1
For my local backups, I also use SuperDuper because there’s no reason not to use SuperDuper and Time Machine. What I like about SuperDuper is that it creates a bootable clone of my MacBook Air.
The point of an off-site backup is so someone breaks into your house and steals all your gear, or if your home is destroyed by a natural disaster, you won’t lose your most important files.
You don’t need to keep an exact clone of your entire computer in the Cloud so much as you should make sure that your most important and valuable files are stored somewhere other than the hard drive in your desk drawer.
For my off-site backup I actually rely on three different services: Backblaze, Arq, and Dropbox. It’s a little nerdy, I know, but I have my reasons.
For off-site backup of all my documents, music, photos, and other media I use BackBlaze.
Backblaze is relatively cheap for what they offer: unlimited file storage for $5/month or $50/year. They’ll even back up external media drives (if you’ve got a drive or two that only keep photos and music).
The Backblaze utility runs natively on your Mac and allows detailed control over the frequency and speeds at which your files are backed up. Your data is encrypted on your Mac before being sent to the Backblaze servers. For those who want more security (like me) you can set your own private encryption key, making your data unreadable by anybody who doesn’t know the key.
There are some system folders that Backblaze will not back up, such as the ~/Library folder. Because of this, if I were to lose all my local data, and had only Backblaze to turn to, there are a few important bits I would not have. Primarily, the data stored within apps such as Yojimbo and MarsEdit (which keep their database in their respective Application Support folders in the Library folder). And that is why I use Arq…
Update: I was mistaken about the ~/Library folder not being backed up. Turns out Backblaze does back it up, which means all of my Application Support folders are backed up. This is great. I will still continue to use Arq for the handful of files that I want redundant backups of.
Arq is a utility that creates encrypted backups of whatever files or folders you chose, and uploads them securely to a bucket on your Amazon S3 account.
I use Arq to keep certain Application Support folders backed up via Arq. So that way my Yojimbo database and other apps can be restored if necessary.
And with Amazon’s every-decreasing S3 pricing, my budget of $6.75/month gives me more than enough space.
Like most of you do, I assume, I also keep all my current projects in Dropbox. Since Dropbox syncs on save, anything I’m working on right now gets backed up to my Dropbox account. And so, supposing I write a 1,000-word article while at the coffee shop, and then on the way out my MacBook Air gets struck by lightning, I didn’t lose any of my work.
What else is great about Backblaze, Arq, and Dropbox is that they work anywhere I have an internet connection. If I take my laptop with me on a trip to Colorado, I don’t have to give up my daily off-site backups while traveling. (Though it may take a bit longer on my dad’s slow-as-molasses DSL.)
For $10 month and very little energy I have a system that backs up my data redundantly, securely, and thoroughly. And I don’t have to initiate anything to make it happen.
All this may sound a bit complicated or expensive, but now that it’s set up it all takes care of itself. It is great to know that if my MacBook Air’s SSD ever fails, I won’t lose any files. If my house is destroyed in a fire, I won’t lose any files.2 If somebody steals my laptop, I won’t lose any files.
If all of the above sounds like too much, I’d recommend this basic yet top-notch setup:
With that you’ll have everything you need for a rock-solid backup system: local and off-site backups of all your files and folders that happen without you ever having to think it.
Michael Mulvey:
The more time goes on and the more I really look hard at Microsoft Surface and Windows 8, the more I see a company not ready to cannibalize one area of their business in order for another part to thrive.
And for innovation to happen, you need that cannibalization.
Cannibalizing one area of your business in order for another part to thrive is easy to talk about in a staff meetings, and it’s easy to say when you’re talking about someone else, but it’s very hard to do when it comes to your own products. Because to do it, you have to be a little bit crazy and a little bit wild.
Peter Bright:
Microsoft is telling both users and hardware manufacturers alike that to get the most out of Windows 8, you’re going to need a keyboard and a pixel-perfect pointing device. Touch alone just doesn’t cut it.
Put another way, is the Surface keyboard a feature or a necessity? I think it’s the latter.