Nerd nostalgia.
(Via Khoi.)
Nerd nostalgia.
(Via Khoi.)
Great piece from Iain Broome on the simplicity of the Mac App Store, the bloat of the iTunes store, and the potential of iBookstore.
I think we’re all agreed that iTunes is getting more bloated by the minute. But that’s because iTunes houses and plays all our media, is the best way to buy and download new media, and is the only place to sync that media to our iDevices. That is a lot for what started out as an MP3 player, but I would rather have a bit of bloat than a lot of de-centralization.
Ian Mackay on discovering applications in the Mac App Store:
I believe people have one of three things in mind when they are looking for an application to use.
Suitability for a given task. For example: “I want to write a novel.” “I want to create a birthday card.”
Similarity to an existing application. Some applications set a paradigm to which all others are compared (e.g. Microsoft Word, Adobe Photoshop).
Inclusion of a specific feature or design pattern. Usually one that the person uses a lot, so it’s a big time-saver.
In the 1800’s the QWERTY keyboard was developed to make mechanical typewriters more reliable. By moving letters that commonly followed each other further apart, there was less chance of the swing-arm typebars colliding and jamming. In effect it slowed down typists.
In 1936 August Dvorak patented the “Simplified Keyboard” which did away with historical clunky skeuomorphism. Rather than comfort, Dvorak was interested in productivity.
Despite QWERTY’s dominance today, people like W.P.M. Guinness record holder Barbara Blackburn see a dramatic improvement in speed and accuracy after switching to DVORAK.
We’re Paste, and we like this story a whole lot.
Tweaky is a GUI utility app for adjusting the super secret defaults
preferences that are there in Twiter for Mac (Tweetie 2) but are only visible to those who bought that MacHeist bundle a while back.
The only “super secret” adjustment I care about is the ability to escape out of the Tweet compose window. And that can be done via the Terminal:
defaults write com.twitter.twitter-mac ESCClosesComposeWindow -bool true
Ben Brooks has a fantastic addition to my Mac App Store piece, stating the store was launched not primarily for the users but for the current pool of iOS developers:
My guess is that if they truly did this as a simplification of the OS they would have waited until 10.7 — giving everyone a clean breaking point for making the transition.
Apple reached a fork in the road: they could have gambled on iOS developers being willing to develop for the Mac when they release 10.7; instead they chose a safer path of launching now, at the very moment interest in such a distribution channel was at its peak.
And note that most of the new apps in the Mac App Store were ported iOS games.
Many thanks to Cyberspace for sponsoring the RSS feed this week. Cyberspace is a Web browser for your iPad and iPhone/iPod touch that is jam packed with useful and thought-out features not found in Safari. It’s got Twitter, OmniFocus, and Instapaper support baked in. As well as in-flight text mobilizer using Instapaper’s engine.
Cyberspace is a universal app, and is just $2 on the App Store.
And so now my dad can get an iPhone.
Apple is simplifying and refining OS X with primarily one user group in mind: the decidedly non-nerdy.
The Mac App Store is the current epitome of where Apple wants to take OS X and the Mac user experience. This is the first of some significant steps towards the next evolution of Apple’s desktop software.
It used to be that buying and installing an app was a chore. But now, with the Mac App Store, it’s as simple as finding an app you want and clicking a button. Just like buying a song or renting a movie in iTunes. The whole experience is familiar, easy, and even a little bit fun.
And so it will go with Apple’s desktop software. OS X will not be advancing towards touch-screen desktops, 3D monitors, and power-packed Finder features. Instead it will be getting more and more simple — with heavy emphasis on a simple way to find your files and applications, the ability to focus in on one app at a time, and other features built for the non-nerdy.
Apple has worked very hard to keep the user experience of iOS as simple and straightforward as possible. And it is the simplicity of iOS that will influence OS X 10.7 more than anything else. In an article on Macworld, Andy Ihnatko says:
I recently read something about Walt Disney that seemed very familiar. A man who worked with him said (I’m paraphrasing) Walt wanted to make sure that if you came to Disney World, you would have a fantastic time. And he succeeded. But he also wanted to make sure that you wouldn’t even have the option of having a bad time.
That’s everything you need to know about Apple. Its roller coaster is smooth, clean, and well-maintained.
Of course simplification and a better user experience is not the only goal of the Mac App Store. It’s also there for economic purposes. (Duh!)
The average consumer spends very little money or time buying and tinkering with new software for their computer. In fact, many people are simply using Web apps for their basic computing needs: Facebook, Twitter, Gmail, Amazon, wordpress.com, etc. — all in the browser. The average person does not go out looking for new software. They buy and use what their friends tell them to get or what their job requires that they get.
One of Apple’s primary selling points of the iPhone and iPad is all the things you can do on it. When people find and use apps through the iOS App Store they become more “hooked” to their iPhone and/or iPad. Put another way: the apps a person uses on their device are precisely what make the device valuable to the user.
And the same is true for the Mac. However, up until yesterday, finding and installing apps for your Mac was not nearly as easy as finding and installing apps on your iPhone or iPad.
The problem had nothing to do with availability or quality of 3rd-party Mac software. To the contrary, OS X has an outstanding community of 3rd-party developers. You and I have no problem finding and using new tools to make our day-to-day computing experience better, but the average consumer does.
And so Apple wants to introduce the non-nerdy to all the fantastic software that is available for OS X. Which is precisely the goal of Mac App Store.
And it appears to be working. The Mac App Store launched with 1,000 apps in it. In its first 24 hours over 1,000,000 apps were downloaded from the Mac App Store. And of the 1,000 unique apps only a few were brand new.
Alfred — an app which I suspect most of you reading this are familiar with — saw over 30,000 downloads on the first day in the Mac App Store. Evernote — another app I assume you’ve heard of — saw an 1,800% increase in their new-user sign-up rate.
My point here is that these well-known and established apps still did great in the Mac App Store on the first day. It’s not just the new apps that are being downloaded for the sake of their newness. There is still a large and un-tapped section of the market for 3rd-parting Macintosh software.
At the end of the day Apple is still just a company doing business and trying to make a buck.
Apple’s integrated and easy-to-use storefronts have proven to be successful on every level. The iOS App Store has seen over one billion apps downloaded. iTunes is the number one music store in the world. These store fronts are providing significant income for Apple, developers, and artists. Not to mention a very easy-to-use store for users.
Why not take that same business model and apply it to the already thriving ecosystem of Macintosh desktop software? It will no doubt be a huge success for Apple, 3rd-party developers, and users.
Developers win because they’ve got a significantly larger market to sell their products to with highly increased discoverability. And though they only get 70% of the sale it is better to sell 5 applications at 70% your normal profit than 2 applications at 100%.
Moreover, for software sold through the Mac App Store developers do not have to deal with managing their own serial number and payment processing systems, file hosting, and even (at least to a degree) tier-1 support.
It will be interesting to see how many developers stop selling their software on their own site and begin to sell exclusively on the Mac App Store. Pixelmator, TapeDeck and CoverSutra have already made the switch to being sold exclusively on the Mac App Store. How long until this becomes the norm?
In many ways the Mac App Store is today what the iTunes music store was in 2003 — a new storefront to help promote and grow an already-established industry that could use a bit of a boost.
A great list of FAQs from Macworld.
They’re not cheap, but they are 22% faster and up to 3 times the capacity of the stock SSDs that ship with the Airs. I have an OWC Mercury Extreme SSD in my MacBook Pro and I love it.
(Via TUAW.)
I have only ever heard fabulous things about Postbox from all its users. I just haven’t been able to get into it myself yet.
Sounds like a hit. Evernote, for example, saw an 1,800% increase in their new-user sign-up rate.
But I wonder what the category and pricing breakdown is for those 1,000,000 downloads? How many were free apps that people downloaded for fun to see how things work? How many downloads were popular iOS games that have been ported and are less than $5? How many were $20 and over apps that were new to the person downloading?
Great article by Kyle Neath on the importance of human-friendly URL design. He’s primarily talking about usability and longevity of the URL structure as it relates to web apps, his underlying point is relevant for all types of web sites.
Two years ago I modified all the permalinks. For the first 18 months, each permalink had a simple “…/year/article-name/” structure. Such as:
https://shawnblanc.net/2010/great-french-press-coffee/
I remember purposefully setting them up that way in order to keep the URLs as short and sweet as possible. However, when I read other weblogs I often glance at the URL to reference when the post was published. And I felt that having my posts linked by their year of publication alone left a bit to be desired.
Because, comparing two articles — one written on December 31, 2008 and the other on January 1, 2009 — it may seem as if they were written an entire year apart, instead of one day. And similarly, two posts — one written January 1, 2008 and the other on December 31, 2008 — may seem chronologically near, but are actually not.
Which is why, in 2009, I changed the permalinks to look like this:
https://shawnblanc.net/2010/12/great-french-press-coffee/
By adding the month of publication to the URL it is still short, and there is now an added reference to aid the savvy reader. Additionally, the new permalink structure is a three-in-one tool for reading. You can peel back the layers of the URL to dig deeper into this site.
If you delete the article name from the URL you will find yourself at the archive listing for the year and month of that article’s publication date. If you then delete the month from the URL you get the archive listing for the whole year.
Ian Hines has really put some thought into the URL structure of his weblog and has done something quite clever. Using a vanity URL and adjusting the slug of each category his URLs literally read like a sentence containing subject, verb, and object in that order:
[http://ianhin.es/wrote-about/designing-urls-for-humans](http://ianhin.es/wrote-about/designing-urls-for-humans)