Horace Dediu:
Ever since the iPad launched the hypothesis that it has an impact on PC has been hanging in the air.
Horace Dediu:
Ever since the iPad launched the hypothesis that it has an impact on PC has been hanging in the air.
Dustin Curtis, while giving Vizio a hard time about their marketing, hits on a very important and relevant issue:
People stopped buying computers based on specifications and features years ago. All computers sold now are practically identical in functionality. Today, people are increasingly buying computers the same way they buy cars: to define themselves.
That’s an interesting and very touchy thought, and I mostly agree with Dustin. I realize this is a very deep and personal topic and I am not going to give it the justice it deserves in this one post, but it is a topic worthy of consideration. It is the topic of people trying to be defined by their stuff. It is the consumerist culture. It is something that Chris and I talked about on his latest episode of Creatiplicity, and it is something that came out strongly in Mat Honan’s vulnerable CES article.
You can tell a lot about a man by looking at the sort of car he drives, the grill in his back yard, the phone in his pocket, or the computer in his office. But there is no right or wrong answer here — bigger and more expensive stuff is not at all synonymous with good character and high moral values. In fact, sadly, often the opposite is true.
Instead, look at how he (or she) treats his family. What is his character like? Look at his relationships and his beliefs and how he spends his time. These things — the metaphysical, the intangible — they are the true extension of the soul.
I may drive a Jeep because I’m a Colorado boy at heart, and I may own a charcoal grill because I like things “pure”, and I may own Apple gadgets because I have an affinity for fine software. So yes, you can tell a lot about me by the things I own. But they are just that — things. They can be stolen, broken, taken, and lost. They should never become distractions to the things that matter most, nor should I ever allow them to define my character, my relationships, and my beliefs.
Kevin Purdy gives some suggestions for staying productive at home. One of them is having a routine, such as starting work at the same time every day and taking a lunch break, etc.
I’ve found that as a self-employed guy who works from home, having a routine and a daily schedule helps keep me from over-working. My schedule is more than just a way for me to stay productive and on track, it’s also how I set boundaries for how much time I work.
Marco Arment reviewed his coffee Joulies several months ago. After I received mine I did a similar test but never ended up turning it into an article. Today, Marco linked to this report by Jeff Ammons and it reminded me that I at least ought to post the results I charted.
Considering Jeff’s findings, and how well the Joulies did on Kickstarter, I wonder if there’s a market for Hand-Curated Coffee Rocks.
Thirty-five things Noah Stokes has learned in his 35 years. Wise man that Mr. Stokes.
(Happy birthday, Noah.)
Sadly, most of the junk mail I get these days is from companies I already do business with.
I’ve been getting my internet service from Time Warner Cable for 9 years. They provide the fastest internet in my neighborhood and I have always subscribed to their top-of-the-line service plan. About once a month I get a letter in the mail that says “Urgent Customer Information” on the envelope. Yet I open the letter only to find that it is junk mail, trying to up-sell me to a phone and TV package as well.
My wife and I have been AT&T customers since 2007. We have a family plan with unlimited texting, and the expensive data plan for our iPhones. For years they sent me junk mail trying to get me to sign up for their U-Verse services. One day I finally called to look into it only to find out that it wasn’t even available in my neighborhood.
Getting junk mail and advertisements from companies I don’t do business with is annoying enough. But getting it from the companies which I have been a long-time and deeply invested customer is quite annoying.
I understand the need to make known new services and new promotions to your customer base. If TWC gets a newer and faster internet service I want to know about it so I can consider upgrading.
You would think that at the bare minimum a company would let me opt out of their junk mail, would not cry wolf by pretending their junk mail is urgent when it’s really just and ad, and would not waste our time by trying to sell me something that I can’t even buy.
Alas, these companies are not targeting me with a relevant promotion. I am simply a name on a database that they know is up-to-date because I paid my bill last month.
Blanket marketing is easy because all it takes is money — you design a flyer and send it to as many addresses as you can find. It’s like throwing spaghetti at your customers to see what sticks on who.
Relevant marketing, however, is hard because it requires thought and planning.
A first look at some of the behind-the-scenes features of Lettercase: a currently-in-private-beta Mac app by Micah Rich. Lettercase looks like it may be the first social font manager, and after reading Michah’s description and plans for Lettercase it sounds very cool.
Stephen Hackett:
Microsoft is compromising where it matters the most — the user experience. […]
To Microsoft, the product comes first. Apple puts the customer first.
I felt the same way after using the Galaxy Nexus. In my review I wrote:
In short, the Galaxy Nexus seems more like a phone that its makers can brag about making rather than a device that its users would brag about owning. It has all sorts of features that seem great on posters and billboards and board meeting reports, but none of those features enhance the actual user experience.
It’s not that Apple puts the users first out of the goodness of their hearts. Designing a killer user experience is part of their core business model. They put users first because happy customers are good for business.
When you are having a brainstorming session with your business partners, it is easy to raise the flag that user experience is your company’s number one priority. But on a granular level, putting the user first is extremely difficult. It takes a lot of time, energy, and attention to detail. When it gets into the nuts and bolts of putting the users first, it’s easy to stop when you reach good enough.
But good enough is a recipe for irritated users, not happy ones.
Like I said in my piece yesterday on the iPhone being 5 years ahead of other software:
You can use Apple’s ideas and you can copy their products, but you cannot copy the time and energy they put into those products, and you cannot copy their attention to detail. Those you have to do on your own. Five years later, some companies still haven’t figured that out.
(As an aside, Apple’s march against good enough will also be found in so many of the 3rd-party iOS and Mac OS X developers. That is because like begets like. Attention to detail breeds attention to detail, and excellence breeds excellence. Android, however, is good enough. Therefore, so are the majority of its 3rd-party apps.)
Dr. Drang:
On/off switches used to literally control the power that ran a device. Now, they often just send signals to the device—signals that mimic, after a fashion, the old, true power switch. Is there a switch on your Mac that cuts off its power? No.
Excellent article by Clay Shirky:
For the moment at least, the most promising experiment in user support means forgoing mass in favor of passion.
Believe it or not, I was a guest on not just one, but two podcasts this week. The second was episode 100 of Enough — The Minimal Mac Podcast. I, along with, 9 other handsome nerds joined in to talk tech and what not. It was a lot of fun.
And congratulations to Patrick Rhone and Myke Hurley on this, their 100th episode of Enough.
Chris Bowler asked me to come on as a guest for his most recent episode of Creatiplicy. As you no doubt remember, I used to be the co-host with Chris Bowler for the show’s first 20 episodes. It was fun to jump back in for a week as Chris asked me some very good questions about balancing priorities between work and family life, how it feels to be a tech writer in such a crowded space, and more.
News to me is that some iPhone and iPad Home buttons become unresponsive. Both Marco and Khoi have had trouble with theirs. Marco tried a software recalibration which didn’t fix anything, but Khoi sprayed his Home button with WD-40 and it did fix it.
Never in a million years would I have thought to spray WD-40 on a gadget. Even after hearing Khoi’s testimony I still don’t know if I could bring myself to do it.
Five years ago, when Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone, he said the software was 5 years ahead of what was on any other phone:
Now, software on mobile phones is like baby software. It’s not so powerful. And today, we’re going to show you a software breakthrough. Software that’s at least 5 years ahead of what’s on any other phone.
This is a tough thing to answer because you can’t just set iOS down next to Windows Phone and webOS and Android and make a clear cut judgment that yes they have finally caught up to iOS or that no they haven’t.
Dan Frommer takes a swing and writes some good thoughts:
So, was the iPhone really 5 years ahead of everyone? Have any of Apple’s competitors caught up to the original iPhone, let alone today’s?
Yes and no.
It’s true. If you were to compare feature to feature only, then Android and iOS come out pretty much even. They are both touch-screen operating systems. They both have scrolling list views, Web browsers, and email clients. And they both have an app store.
But in many ways, iOS and Android are on two different planets.
The user experience is certainly different between the two. And while Android is much more responsive in version 4.0, there are still no killer 3rd-party apps, and Android still feels a bit awkward.
And that is what I think Steve Jobs was talking about when he said that the iPhone was at least 5 years ahead.
For Steve and for Apple, software is not just about the feature set. It’s about the entire user experience. The fact that the original iPhone didn’t have copy and paste is a testament to how Apple sees the user experience as more important than the feature set. In that regard, 5 years later, iOS is still ahead.
You can use Apple’s ideas and you can copy their products, but you cannot copy the time and energy they put into those products, and you cannot copy their attention to detail. Those you have to do on your own. Five years later, some companies still haven’t figured that out.