This is a great interview with one of my favorite writers in the biz, Andy Ihnatko. His answer to “Have you ever suffered from writer’s block?” is stellar:

No. There have been times when I haven’t been confident about what I was writing; times when I’ve had no clue about how to continue something; certainly there’ve been days when I haven’t felt like writing and even a few days when I’ve felt like I’d already written my last thing, ever.

These are all tangible problems with workable solutions. I can deal with tangible problems. If I were to believe in “Writer’s Block” I’d be taking a fear that I haven’t explored and I’d be amplifying its paralytic power by giving it a name.

I also like how Randy Murray puts it: “Give yourself permission to stink.”

Andy Ihnatko’s Advice to Writers

Matthew Panzarino:

Haptics is a tactile feedback technology which uses forces — normally vibrations in mobile devices — to provide feedback through your sense of touch. Most Android phones have some sort of haptic feedback at play and you can feel them at work when you touch the keyboard and get that bzt of a vibration in return. Apple has even filed patents for advanced forms of vibrating haptics. The only problem is that vibrating haptic systems, for the most part, kind of suck.

Something that I simultaneously do and don’t like about Android phones is the vibrate-on-touch haptic feedback — the way the phone will vibrate when you tap on a button. In does help with typing, but at the same time it can be a bit overwhelming to have the entire phone buzz in your hand every time you tap a letter.

This rumor that Matthew Panzarino brings up about an electrostatic-based haptic feedback technology has been circulating for at least a week or more, and I’ve been thinking about it a bit. I am having a hard time imagining just how great or not-great it would be in real life, but, what struck me today is that if anything, I bet this new type of feedback could greatly improve the ability to type on the iPad.

Here’s a CNET video with Dave Rice demoing the technology, and Panzarino’s article has an embedded video as well demoing the tech.

With this electrostatic-based haptic feedback, the whole device doesn’t buzz when you touch a feedback area, only the tip of your finger senses the “friction” that’s transmitted through the screen:

It has a system that uses varying electrostatic fields that can be pushed right through a pane of glass to give a user the feeling of various levels of friction, simulating surfaces. You can see the technology demonstrated back in 2010 on an iPhone here.

I have no personal experience trying this type of technology and so it’s hard to imagine what it’s like. If this does get announced in an hour from now it would make a lot of sense as to why the “And touch.” was part of the invite.

You can only understand the pizazz of a Retina display by looking at one in real life. And it’s likely that you can only truly understand the pizazz of this new touch-feedback technology by touching it in real life.

Electrostatic Haptic Feedback?

My thanks to Denso for sponsoring the RSS feed this week.


Denso is a video app for people who don’t know what to watch.

Create personalized video channels by connecting your Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook and Google Reader accounts.

Connect your Instapaper, Readability and Evernote accounts to Denso so you can bookmark videos from around the web to Watch Later.

Browse from our carefully curated list of channels which have an eclectic mix of interesting videos.

See what all the fuss is about. It’s Free on the App Store and the Android Market.

Sponsor: Denso

Chris Sauve:

iOS devices have, on average, reached 10% version share 300 times faster than Android versions, 30% share 19 times faster, and 50% share 7 times faster.

It will be fascinating to see how these numbers change now that iOS features wireless updating.

Also:

In a way, I think that iOS buyers are paying to be on the cutting edge of software. Android OEMs have been one-upping each other on the hardware front (the Android spec race has reached almost ridiculous proportions), but this is a shallow, easily-duplicated strategy. An ecosystem that has been developed instead with a software focus affords many advantages that are not easily mimicked: ease of development, users being able to learn about apps and the OS from friends without the frustration of fragmented device capabilities, and more.

Version Distribution: iOS vs. Android

Mark Willis pitches some interesting solutions to common problems. The hiccup in signal continuity for when the iPhone decides to transition from a dwindling wi-fi signal to 3G drives me nuts as well. I don’t think Apple would ever go with Mark’s idea of having a setting pane that allowed the user to tell the iPhone that if wi-fi signal is less than, say, 75% strong to drop it and switch to 3G instead. But I do like the concept.

A Couple Things Apple Could Do Better